<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rolledtootight. &#187; cannabis economics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rolledtootight.com/tag/cannabis-economics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com</link>
	<description>too tight and don&#039;t draw worth shit.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 21:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Canada: Ontario closer than ever to legalization of marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/canada-ontario-closer-than-ever-to-legalization-of-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/canada-ontario-closer-than-ever-to-legalization-of-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=1124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Ontario is one step closer to the legalization of marijuana after the Ontario Superior Court struck down two key parts of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act that prohibit the possession and production of pot.
The court declared the rules that govern medical marijuana access and the prohibitions laid out in sections 4 and 7 of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fcanada-ontario-closer-than-ever-to-legalization-of-marijuana%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fcanada-ontario-closer-than-ever-to-legalization-of-marijuana%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Ontario is one step closer to the legalization of marijuana after the Ontario Superior Court struck down two key parts of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act that prohibit the possession and production of pot.</p>
<p>The court declared the rules that govern medical marijuana access and the prohibitions laid out in sections 4 and 7 of the Act “constitutionally invalid and of no force and effect” on Monday, effectively paving the way for legalization.</p>
<p>If the government does not respond within 90 days with a successful delay or re-regulation of marijuana, the drug will be legal to possess and produce in Ontario, where the decision is binding.</p>
<p>The ruling stemmed from the constitutional challenge of Matthew Mernagh, a man who relies on medical marijuana to ease pain brought on by fibromyalgia, scoliosis, seizures and depression.</p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/CBfRLA">Continue reading at the National Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/canada-ontario-closer-than-ever-to-legalization-of-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado may impose a legal THC level for driving</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/colorado-may-impose-a-legal-thc-level-for-driving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/colorado-may-impose-a-legal-thc-level-for-driving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving with pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolledtootight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THC level]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
The surge of medical marijuana use in Colorado has started another debate in the state Legislature: What constitutes driving while high?
Lawmakers are considering setting a DUI blood-content threshold for marijuana that would make Colorado one of three states with such a provision in statute - and one of the most liberal, according to Rep. Claire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fcolorado-may-impose-a-legal-thc-level-for-driving%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fcolorado-may-impose-a-legal-thc-level-for-driving%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The surge of medical marijuana use in Colorado has started another debate in the state Legislature: What constitutes driving while high?</p>
<p>Lawmakers are considering setting a DUI blood-content threshold for marijuana that would make Colorado one of three states with such a provision in statute - and one of the most liberal, according to Rep. Claire Levy, one of the bill's sponsors.</p>
<p>Under the proposal, drivers who test positive for 5 nanograms or more of THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, would be considered too impaired to drive if the substance is present in their blood at the time they're pulled over or within two hours.</p>
<p>Levy, a Democrat from Boulder, said she's gotten resistance from medical marijuana advocates who fear it will restrict patients from using the drug.</p>
<p>"What I've tried to assure the patient advocates is that we're not talking about sobriety checkpoints, we're not talking about dragnets and massive stops," she said. "They're not going to be stopped if they're driving appropriately."</p>
<p>While it's already illegal to drive while impaired by drugs, states have taken different approaches to the issue. Twelve states, including Arizona, Michigan, Illinois, Iowa, and Rhode Island, have a zero-tolerance policy for driving with any presence of an illegal substance, said Anne Teigen, policy specialist at the National Conference of State Legislatures. Minnesota has the same policy but exempts marijuana. </p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/9Lm4tl">Read the rest here...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/colorado-may-impose-a-legal-thc-level-for-driving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year is 2020: What&#8217;s happening with marijuana?</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/the-year-is-2020-whats-happening-with-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/the-year-is-2020-whats-happening-with-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolledtootight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Social change rarely occurs in a logical direction or at a predictable pace. Many Americans thought rampant, open use of marijuana in the 1960s and '70s would lead quickly to legalization of the drug, but that didn't happen. To the contrary, enforcement of anti-pot laws increased in the 1980s, and penalties grew stiffer. 
But over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fthe-year-is-2020-whats-happening-with-marijuana%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fthe-year-is-2020-whats-happening-with-marijuana%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Social change rarely occurs in a logical direction or at a predictable pace. Many Americans thought rampant, open use of marijuana in the 1960s and '70s would lead quickly to legalization of the drug, but that didn't happen. To the contrary, enforcement of anti-pot laws increased in the 1980s, and penalties grew stiffer. </p>
<p>But over the past few years, as several states and now the District of Columbia have legalized use of marijuana for medicinal purposes, a path to full legalization for recreational use has once again seemed clear to advocates of legalization and skeptics alike. California voters' decision in a referendum Tuesday will play a large role in determining the momentum of the legalization movement. </p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/MeBZ6Z">Continue reading and view a cool video at The Washington Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/the-year-is-2020-whats-happening-with-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana on the ballot: 6 states moving toward &#8216;legalization&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/marijuana-on-the-ballot-6-states-moving-toward-legalization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/marijuana-on-the-ballot-6-states-moving-toward-legalization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolledtootight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
California voters aren't the only ones considering loosening their state laws against pot possession next week.
While the battle to control Congress is getting most of the pre-election ink, voters in several states will also be deciding how to handle the touchy issue of marijuana's legal status. Fourteen states already have medical marijuana laws on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fmarijuana-on-the-ballot-6-states-moving-toward-legalization%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fmarijuana-on-the-ballot-6-states-moving-toward-legalization%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>California voters aren't the only ones considering loosening their state laws against pot possession next week.</p>
<p>While the battle to control Congress is getting most of the pre-election ink, voters in several states will also be deciding how to handle the touchy issue of marijuana's legal status. Fourteen states already have medical marijuana laws on the books, and more are likely to vote in doctor-approved pot use this year or in 2012.</p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/DwHtl9">Read the rest at The Week</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/marijuana-on-the-ballot-6-states-moving-toward-legalization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIDEO: Former surgeon general calls for marijuana legalization</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/video-former-surgeon-general-calls-for-marijuana-legalization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/video-former-surgeon-general-calls-for-marijuana-legalization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 05:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolledtootight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Former U.S. Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders told CNN Sunday she supports legalizing marijuana.
The trend-setting state of California is voting next month on a ballot initiative to legalize pot, also known as Proposition 19. The measure would legalize recreational use in the state, though federal officials have said they would continue to enforce drug laws in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fvideo-former-surgeon-general-calls-for-marijuana-legalization%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fvideo-former-surgeon-general-calls-for-marijuana-legalization%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Former U.S. Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders told CNN Sunday she supports legalizing marijuana.</p>
<p>The trend-setting state of California is voting next month on a ballot initiative to legalize pot, also known as Proposition 19. The measure would legalize recreational use in the state, though federal officials have said they would continue to enforce drug laws in California if the initiative is approved.</p>
<p>"What I think is horrible about all of this, is that we criminalize young people. And we use so many of our excellent resources ... for things that aren't really causing any problems," said Elders. "It's not a toxic substance."</p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/2kL3mH">Read the rest and view the video at CNN.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/video-former-surgeon-general-calls-for-marijuana-legalization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denver Judge says Colorado marijuana law no defense for drug charges</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/denver-judge-says-colorado-marijuana-law-no-defense-for-drug-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/denver-judge-says-colorado-marijuana-law-no-defense-for-drug-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 03:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		

Chris Bartkowicz is a state licensed medical marijuana care-giver that was raided and arrested on the order of a Denver area DEA agent after accepting an invitation by 9NEWS to do an interview about being a Colorado medical marijuana care-giver.
A Colorado pot grower trying a first-in-the-nation drug defense based on Obama administration memos about marijuana [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fdenver-judge-says-colorado-marijuana-law-no-defense-for-drug-charges%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fdenver-judge-says-colorado-marijuana-law-no-defense-for-drug-charges%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img src="http://www.rolledtootight.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/chris-bartkowicz-denver-colorado.jpg" alt="Chris Bartkowicz from Denver Colorado" /></p>
<blockquote><p>Chris Bartkowicz is a state licensed medical marijuana care-giver that was raided and arrested on the order of a Denver area DEA agent after accepting an invitation by 9NEWS to do an interview about being a Colorado medical marijuana care-giver.</p></blockquote>
<p>A Colorado pot grower trying a first-in-the-nation drug defense based on Obama administration memos about marijuana saw his case take a serious blow Wednesday when a federal judge felled the effort.</p>
<p>Christopher Bartkowicz wanted to argue he shouldn't face federal marijuana cultivation charges because he started his basement pot-growing business after seeing memos from Department of Justice officials indicating the U.S. government wouldn't pursue pot cases in states that allow medical marijuana.</p>
<p>But U.S. District Judge Philip A. Brimmer sided with federal prosecutors who argued the memos aren't the same as making marijuana legal under federal law.</p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/GssHA1">Read more...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/denver-judge-says-colorado-marijuana-law-no-defense-for-drug-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona doctors may face marijuana dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/arizona-doctors-may-face-marijuana-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/arizona-doctors-may-face-marijuana-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolledtootight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
As debate over Arizona's medical-marijuana proposition heats up, physicians across the state say the proposition is a double-edged sword.
Physicians agree that marijuana can provide relief for patients with serious illnesses, but they also find ethical dilemmas in recommending a drug that is not federally approved. Others warn against the potential for abuse similar to prescription [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Farizona-doctors-may-face-marijuana-dilemma%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Farizona-doctors-may-face-marijuana-dilemma%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>As debate over Arizona's medical-marijuana proposition heats up, physicians across the state say the proposition is a double-edged sword.</p>
<p>Physicians agree that marijuana can provide relief for patients with serious illnesses, but they also find ethical dilemmas in recommending a drug that is not federally approved. Others warn against the potential for abuse similar to prescription pills.</p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/urnP5e">Read the rest at AZ Central</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/arizona-doctors-may-face-marijuana-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Los Angeles strictly interprets restriction on pot dispensaries</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/los-angeles-strictly-interprets-restriction-on-pot-dispensaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/los-angeles-strictly-interprets-restriction-on-pot-dispensaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
When the Los Angeles City Council adopted its medical marijuana ordinance, it aimed to rout unscrupulous dispensary operators whose unruly customers irritated residents and operators who opened up willy-nilly across the city, ignoring a ban on new stores.
But the ordinance has snared operators who appear to have tried hard to adhere to state law and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Flos-angeles-strictly-interprets-restriction-on-pot-dispensaries%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Flos-angeles-strictly-interprets-restriction-on-pot-dispensaries%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>When the Los Angeles City Council adopted its medical marijuana ordinance, it aimed to rout unscrupulous dispensary operators whose unruly customers irritated residents and operators who opened up willy-nilly across the city, ignoring a ban on new stores.</p>
<p>But the ordinance has snared operators who appear to have tried hard to adhere to state law and the city's rules. Among them are some of the most politically active operators whose dispensaries are considered model operations. Last week, the city sued these dispensaries and dozens of others and asked a judge to rule that they could be shut down.</p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/DnoXDE">Read the rest at L.A. Times</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/los-angeles-strictly-interprets-restriction-on-pot-dispensaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/top-10-cannabis-studies-the-government-wished-it-had-never-funded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/top-10-cannabis-studies-the-government-wished-it-had-never-funded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 07:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Yes, that's right.....Government funded studies have reached conclusions that marijuana prevents cancer, the gateway effect is a myth, and has no increased risk of lung cancer.
Can't really claim bias for this one....
10) MARIJUANA USE HAS NO EFFECT ON MORTALITY:
A massive study of California HMO members funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Ftop-10-cannabis-studies-the-government-wished-it-had-never-funded%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Ftop-10-cannabis-studies-the-government-wished-it-had-never-funded%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Yes, that's right.....Government funded studies have reached conclusions that marijuana prevents cancer, the gateway effect is a myth, and has no increased risk of lung cancer.</p>
<p>Can't really claim bias for this one....</p>
<p>10) MARIJUANA USE HAS NO EFFECT ON MORTALITY:</p>
<p>A massive study of California HMO members funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) found marijuana use caused no significant increase in mortality. Tobacco use was associated with increased risk of death.</p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/ebK5A3">See the rest here...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/top-10-cannabis-studies-the-government-wished-it-had-never-funded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Big Week for Marijuana Legalization</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/a-big-week-for-marijuana-legalization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/a-big-week-for-marijuana-legalization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispensary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolledtootight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
The California Assembly's public safety committee voted 4-3 yesterday in favor of a bill that would legalize marijuana and regulate it like alcohol. Although the bill likely won't go anywhere (it will miss a deadline to reach the full floor for a vote), this is the first time a statewide committee has approved such a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fa-big-week-for-marijuana-legalization%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Fa-big-week-for-marijuana-legalization%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The California Assembly's public safety committee voted 4-3 yesterday in favor of a bill that would legalize marijuana and regulate it like alcohol. Although the bill likely won't go anywhere (it will miss a deadline to reach the full floor for a vote), this is the first time a statewide committee has approved such a measure and it's a sure sign that attitudes are  changing in California and across the country.</p>
<p>The news came a day after New Jersey became the 14th state to approve marijuana for medicinal use. Gov. Jon Corzine says he'll sign the bill into law before he leaves office this week.</p>
<p>The momentum toward marijuana legalization continues to grow. On Monday, activists filed a petition in Washington state that will put full legalization on the ballot before voters in November.</p>
<p>A poll this week in California found 84 percent of the state in favor of legalizing marijuana, and a study conducted by the legislature found that taxing marijuana $50 an ounce would raise about $1 billion for the state.</p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/5FxUlj">Read more...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/a-big-week-for-marijuana-legalization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legalizing and taxing marijuana would benefit society</title>
		<link>http://www.rolledtootight.com/legalizing-and-taxing-marijuana-would-benefit-society/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rolledtootight.com/legalizing-and-taxing-marijuana-would-benefit-society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannabis politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolledtootight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rolledtootight.com/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
California's budget turmoil is the worst in the nation. Sacramento closed a $42 billion deficit this summer only to face tens of billions more red ink already. Most expect another round of tortured budget balancing that further slashes aid to the most vulnerable, raises taxes and fees and kicks the can down the road with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Flegalizing-and-taxing-marijuana-would-benefit-society%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rolledtootight.com%2Flegalizing-and-taxing-marijuana-would-benefit-society%2F&amp;source=rolledtootight&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>California's budget turmoil is the worst in the nation. Sacramento closed a $42 billion deficit this summer only to face tens of billions more red ink already. Most expect another round of tortured budget balancing that further slashes aid to the most vulnerable, raises taxes and fees and kicks the can down the road with billions more in borrowing.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, California's largest cash crop is being largely ignored in the frenzied search for politically-viable revenue. The state’s marijuana yield is conservatively valued at $14 billion annually – nearly double the combined value of our vegetable and grape crops. The state Board of Equalization estimates that taxing adult marijuana consumption like alcohol would generate $1.4 billion in new revenue for the state. While that’s only a modest contribution toward our fiscal woes, it’s one more incentive to end decades of failed marijuana prohibition. In fact, the financial and human price that we currently pay for criminalizing pot is far too high.</p>
<p><a href="http://m17.ca/wAAomM">Continue reading this article...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rolledtootight.com/legalizing-and-taxing-marijuana-would-benefit-society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

